Nobody Knows How Life Started

Here's a question that sounds simple but has stumped the smartest people on the planet for over 70 years: how did life start?

Not how did life EVOLVE — that's a different question. How did the very first living cell arise from non-living chemistry? How did dead molecules become alive?

Nobody knows.

In 1953, Stanley Miller and Harold Urey ran a famous experiment. They simulated what they thought was Earth's early atmosphere, zapped it with electricity, and produced some amino acids — the building blocks of proteins.

Headlines went crazy. "Life created in a lab!" Textbooks still feature this experiment.

But here's what they don't tell you:

• They got amino acids, not LIFE. That's like saying you made a house because you found some bricks in a field.
• The atmosphere they used was almost certainly wrong — the early Earth likely had a different gas composition that doesn't produce amino acids as easily.
• Even the amino acids they got were a mix of types that life doesn't use (life only uses left-handed amino acids; Miller got both).

70+ years later, nobody has come remotely close to creating a living cell from scratch.

The simplest living cell is incomprehensibly complex. Even the most basic bacteria need:

• DNA or RNA to store genetic information
• Proteins to read and execute that information
• A membrane to contain everything
• An energy system to power the whole operation
• A replication system to reproduce

And here's the kicker — these systems are INTERDEPENDENT:

• You need DNA to make proteins
• You need proteins to copy DNA
• You need a membrane to hold it all together
• You need proteins to build the membrane
• You need DNA to code for those proteins

It's a chicken-and-egg problem on steroids. Every component requires the others to already exist. There's no obvious way to build this system one piece at a time.

The most popular current theory is the "RNA World" — the idea that RNA came first because it can both store information AND act as a catalyst (like a protein).

Problems:

• RNA is extremely fragile and breaks down quickly
• Nobody has shown how RNA could form spontaneously in nature
• Even simple self-replicating RNA molecules haven't been produced without heavy intervention from researchers (which kind of defeats the "it happened by accident" argument)
• Getting from self-replicating RNA to an actual CELL is still an enormous gap

Biochemist Robert Shapiro called the RNA World hypothesis "a premature choice" and noted that "the spontaneous formation of RNA under prebiotic conditions is extremely difficult."

Mathematician and astronomer Fred Hoyle calculated the probability of a single functional protein forming by chance. His conclusion: 1 in 10^40,000. For context, there are only about 10^80 atoms in the observable universe.

Hoyle (an atheist) said this is like "a tornado sweeping through a junkyard and assembling a Boeing 747."

Even if you're generous with the numbers, the probability of getting a self-replicating system with DNA, RNA, proteins, and a membrane by random chemistry is... not great. Like, cosmically not great.

Scientists working on this problem are remarkably honest about how stuck they are:

• Eugene Koonin (evolutionary biologist): "The origin of life is the hardest problem in all of science."
• Steve Benner (origin-of-life chemist): "We have failed in our attempt to explain the origin of life."
• James Tour (synthetic chemist, Rice University): "Nobody has a clue how life got started. If they tell you they do, they don't know what they're talking about."

This isn't about "gaps" that science will eventually fill. The more we learn about cellular complexity, the HARDER the problem gets, not easier. Every new discovery reveals another layer of interdependent systems that all need to be present simultaneously.

The Bible says God created life — that he spoke it into existence, that he breathed life into dust. That's a claim about an intelligent agent producing information-rich, functionally complex systems.

Every day in labs around the world, brilliant scientists use their intelligence, planning, and resources to try to create life from scratch. They haven't succeeded. But we're supposed to believe that no intelligence was required when it happened the first time?

Think about that for a second.